Note: Only forum leaders may delete posts.
*HTML is ON *UBB Code is ON Smilies Legend
Smilies Legend
[b]Space Cover #134, The Lifting Body Aircraft and the Hot Rod[/b] It truly was a homemade effort. With extremely little in the way of resources and staff, a small group of scientists, engineers, and staff members at the NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, California, wanted to build an experimental aircraft. One person was a "hot rod" enthusiast, another a sail plane buff, and a few others were airplane aficionados. This small group wanted to further test the startling work of NASA engineer Dale Reed concerning wingless "lifting bodies" in which a flight vehicle could fly without wings, relying solely on its aerodynamic property of lift being greater than drag. But, an experimental aircraft with no wings? This was a startling concept indeed! And, further, it was regarded as a bathtub on a tricycle by the test pilots who were observing this effort. Reed convinced his center director, Paul Bikle, that the lifting body concept was worth further research and received discretionary funding, approximately $30,000, to build the M2-F1 lifting body (meaning, manned two, flight 1), in a cordoned-off section of a hangar at the NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, with a sign reading "Wright's Bicycle Shop" on the curtain shrouding the area. As the lifting body would be unpowered, center employee Whitey Whiteside, also a local hot rod racer, aided the team by facilitating acquisition of a new 1963 Pontiac Catalina convertible. He oversaw the customizing work on the NASA Pontiac at two local car racing shops for the tow car to have the capability of driving and sustaining 110 mph with the M2-F1 lifting body experimental aircraft being pulled behind the car. Gus Briegleb, a high performance sailplane builder at nearby El Mirage Airport, a forty-minute drive from the NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center, was enlisted to build the aircraft fuselage out of wood and plywood. The souped-up Pontiac Catalina convertible outfitted as a tow vehicle and a new, pristine M2-F1 vehicle were in position on dry lake the morning of March 1, 1963, with NASA pilot Milt Thompson in the aircraft cockpit and ready to go. The M2-F1 vehicle bounced down the dry lake behind the Pontiac but was unable to gain enough lift to achieve liftoff. In putting the M2-F1 back through wind tunnel tests at Ames, the vehicle's control system was identified as the problem and was subsequently modified. A second opportunity to fly the M2-F1 occurred April 5, 1963. This time, Milt Thompson lifted off behind the Pontiac and stayed aloft as the Ponticac sped across the dry lake for the test. In the course of the day, several test flights were made by Thompson and towards the end of the day he was able to fly the length of the four-mile test area while under tow. With additional experience in subsequent months, Thompson was able to make additional M2-F1 towed flights with increased speed and higher altitudes. Tragedy was narrowly averted on take-off on Jerry Gentry's M2-F1 test flight July 26, 1965, behind "Gooney Bird," the USAF C-47 tow plane piloted by Stan Butchart at Edwards Air Force Base, California. Climbing past 200 feet altitude, the M2-F1 aircraft began oscillating wildly. Co-pilot of the C-47 tow plane, Vic Horton, watched in horror as the M2-F1 with Jerry Gentry rolled belly-up and disappeared from view behind the tail of the tow plane. Butchart yelled, "Release" and then "Eject" to Gentry, but the test pilot had his hands full trying to correct the low amplitude lateral oscillation that confronted him with the experimental aircraft. Probability of recovery from an inverted and nose high condition by a pilot would be zero. Gentry trying to deal with the situation, ignored the probability of crashing and upon his release from the tow aircraft, deftly completed the M2-F1's barrel roll touching down hard on the dry lake's landing surface at the bottom of the barrel roll as if it were planned. His in-flight emergency had transpired in only nine seconds from beginning to end, and had smashed the M2-F1's landing gear. Gentry calmly exited the M2-F1 and walked away with no personal injury or other apparent aircraft damage besides a collapsed Cessna 150 landing gear. In aviator terminology, he thought as he walked away, "Any landing you walk away from is a good one!" Some landing! NASA engineer, Dale Reed, a strong proponent of lifting body theory at the NASA Flight Research Center and also involved in M2-F1 development and testing, later accurately described lifting body flight and its importance in this period. "...the lifting-body concept was so tentative in the minds of space planners that the M2-F1 program seemed destined to have pronounced effect on the direction taken afterwards in space vehicles, the potential for development of horizontal-landing spacecraft fairly much dependent upon our success." Reed further commented that if there had been a serious accident with the M2-F1, the program would have been finished with no additional lifting body flights being made and impacting on horizontally landing spacecraft including planning for the Space Shuttle. Summarizing these points, Reed remarked, "...the M2-F1 program could be an adventure in success and open the door for future lifting-body programs." And, that is exactly what happened!
Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts
Copyright 1999-2024 collectSPACE. All rights reserved.